Article 24416

Title of the article



Tarasov Nikolay Grigoryevich, Doctor of economic sciences, professor, chief researcher, All-Russian Research Institute of Production Organization, Labor and Management in Agricultural Industry (15 Orenburgskaya street, Moscow, Russia),

Index UDK





Background. The appraisal of agricultural producers’ perfomance in conditions of the market economy is prevailed by natural indicators: tons, centners, billions and millions of rubles. The quantitative part of reproduction – profitability of work, depreciation, investments – is reflected indirectly and appears to be supperessed in most cases. Underestimation of indicators of profitability of agrarian work leads to a decrease in the income of rural population and a growth of its poverty in comparison with the urban. In these conditions, the social part in assessment of agricultural producers’ performance gains importance.
Materials and methods. The research tasks were implemented through a study of official documents, in particular, the Doctrine of food security of the Russian Federation, where the level of population’s income, providing rational food standards, is included into a list of paramount issues of food security, an analysis of statistical data, which shows a low pay level of work in the agricultural sector and income of rural population being a serious social risk.
Results and conclusions
. To strengthen the social part in the assessment of results it is suggested to regulate a ratio between labor remuneration growth and the employer’ profit in the gross value added structure, and also to include their standard rates in the system of social partnership.

Key words

profitability of work, households, located resources, gross value added, GVA structure, social justice and partnership

Download PDF

1. MSKh RF. O sostoyanii sel'skikh territoriy v RF v 2013 g. Ezhegodnyy doklad po rezul'tatam monitoringa (pervyy vypusk) [The Ministry of Agriculture of Russia. On the condition of rural territories of Russia in 2013. Annual report on monitoring results (first issue)]. Moscow: FGBNU «Rosinformagrotekh», 2015, 343 p.
2. Buzdalov I. N. Agroprodovol'stvennaya politika Rossii [Agricultural commodities policy of Russia]. 2015, no. 8, pp. 2–11.
3. Ushachev I. G. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterpises]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 2–11.
4. Altukhov A. I. Ekonomist [The Economist]. 2016, no. 6, pp. 11–24.
5. Petrikov A. V. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterpises]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 11–18.
6. Zinchenko A. P. Voprosy statistiki [Statistical questions]. 2016, no. 4.
7. Zinchenko A. P. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy akademii [Proceedings of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 97–107.
8. Borkhunov N. A., Rodionova O. A. Ekonomika sel'skokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy [Economy of agricultural and processing enterpises]. 2014, no. 11, pp. 16–22.
9. Borkhunov N. A., Rodionova O. A. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie [Agro-industrial sector: economy, management]. 2015, no. 9, pp. 60–67.
10. Gur'yanov M. A. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie [Agro-industrial sector: economy, management]. 2010, no. 12, pp. 56–60.
11. Rodionova O., Borkhunov N., Grishkina S. Ekonomika sel'skogo khozyaystva Rossii [Agricultural economy of Russia]. 2010, no. 12, p. 70.
12. Zinchenko A. P. Voprosy statistiki [Statistical questions]. 2016, no. 5.
13. APK: ekonomika i upravlenie [Agro-industrial sector: economy, management]. 2016, no. 6, p. 5.
14. MSKh RF. Agropromyshlennyy kompleks Rossii v 2013 i 2014 godakh [The Ministry of Agriculture of Russia. The Agro-industrial sector of Russia in 2013 and 2014]. Moscow, 2014–2015.
15. Tarasov N. G., Eryukova I. D. Voprosy statistiki [Statistical questions]. 2015, no. 11, pp. 34–42.


Дата создания: 07.06.2017 15:28
Дата обновления: 15.06.2017 15:59